The Way In Which We're Changing Our World

I spend a lot of time thinking about how our world is changing and what we, as the human race and dominant animal on our planet, are doing to our environment and ourselves. My mind goes round and round wondering how it is that we can continue in behavior that clearly does us harm. There are all sorts of examples of this, both obvious ones and not so obvious ones. We can become addicted to all sorts of behavior, substances and even emotional circumstances. The question is why?

Most people are well-meaning, considerate and wouldn't intentionally hurt others. But it seems the truth is, we're not being alerted to certain conditions quickly enough to trigger a healthy response to ensure ourselves a better future. Today someone sent me a video entitled: "Why haven’t we rallied our collective power to solve global warming?", and it happens to cover this very question and seems to provide an answer to this query.

I don't usually link to videos because they can often take more time than a person might want to give. Here is the choice of listening to the well-prepared talk by Dan Gilbert in video format, or a shorter summary in print. (The print version includes a reference in the title which I would not personally use as an example in today's world as something offensive to the general public's morality and I don't wish to offend anyone by linking to this. But if taken as simply an illustration that can be replaced by something that is offensive to the reader, then the point being made remains apparent.) I do recommend watching the video talk if you can spare the time - it's about 14 minutes long.

If I understood it correctly, Dan Gilbert, Professor of Psychology at Harvard University, is saying that because our brains aren't wired to pick up gradual, impersonal changes we don't vividly compute such changes as an immediate threat even though they may be tremendously dangerous to us in the future.

I've always thought that if every breath I take didn't hurt (it doesn't hurt when I'm in pristine country air) I too would completely forget about global warming, pollution, the overuse of chemicals, cleaning products, laundry products, fabric softeners and perfumes. But each breath racks the lungs with burning pain and the brain with the continual question: why?

I remember how vibrantly blue the sky looked against a beautifully crisp green tree when I looked up as a teenager. I remember specifically telling myself to always remember that snapshot view because it was so fantastic. And today these truly brilliant colors of nature around us can still be seen, but only rarely and on especially clear days. And I wonder how we can forget what our world was not so very long ago and how we can tolerate it...and I'm not that old!

And then when I watch a beautiful bird, an African Grey, scratch and fleece herself of her feathers in very specific spots and become lethargic and dull, as a result of being poisoned in that same chemically poisonous atmosphere, my cry of anguish and the question "why?" becomes even more excruciating. Previous post "Jasmine and Her Continuing Tousle With Air Quality" gives the background to this, if you're not familiar with Jasmine.

Somehow I feel better with the understanding that Dan Gilbert's talk gives. I knew it wasn't malice on our part as human beings, but it seemed so inexplicable and has been perplexing me for some time. Hopefully soon we can show our intelligence on a large scale, to save the beauty of our planet, ourselves and the other living beings we share it with, both microscopically tiny and large. I hope it answers something for you too. Cheers.

Breathing One Breath At A Time

I'm aware of almost every breath I take - and that's because most of the time it hurts to breathe. This discomfort increases or lessens with variations in the air quality in my environment. There are some positive aspects to this: I'm great to have around as an air quality monitor. Unfortunately there are rather too many inconveniences that arise from this situation to balance out the positive, and no one has yet offered me a job as an air quality meter!

Our town is expanding in size at a phenomenal rate, perhaps doubling or tripling in the number of apartment buildings in just the last year alone. In a two-block radius from where we live the number of cranes that can be seen actively involved in constructing new apartments is astonishing. Rapid expansion is the norm almost everywhere today, bringing with it increased activity of all types.

Traffic locally has increased dramatically as the number of households increases. And there are more cars per household because more people need to go to work to sustain the family unit in the face of increased cost of living. Our apartment block car-park is now filled to overflowing, whereas a year ago spaces were easily found at all times.

We live a block away from a large school which is at the end of a dead end road. Four times a day school buses and long lines of cars wait in line to drop children off at the school and then turn around and wait in line to exit the cul-de-sac. Diesel fumes in our neighborhood continue to rise.

Many people still choose to burn their garden refuse outside in small or large bonfires, rather than take it to the dump where it can often be disposed of in a more environmentally friendly manner. The result is that most days, usually for an hour or so, the strong acrid smell of smoke and particles of ash drifts by our apartment building.

The sky blue becomes remote and is filled instead with a brown-orange haze. Trees become less distinct, blurred by haze of pollution. Reflections no longer show bright and dazzling, instead they glow dull yellow.

When the rain and wind comes it clears the air and the sparkling brilliance and wonder of our earth is clear to see again. But with each passing year, the length of time this lasts after a rainfall is becoming less before it builds up and becomes murky from our activities again.

With every breath I take I'm aware of this progression, acutely aware because I'm forced to notice it. As a kid I traveled with my family to many places, experienced many different environmental conditions and inadvertently was exposed to a good number of toxic substances - things that are now coming to be recognized as problematic to the health.

The prolific number of articles being published these days about all kinds of substances used in products that are now being discovered to be harmful to our health is hard to miss. Here's a few about pollution:

1. "Pneumonia 'linked' to Pollution" BBC News, April 14, 2008. Professor George Knox, of the University of Birmingham, wrote in a research report that there were high mortality rates observed in areas with elevated ambient pollution levels. The strongest single effect was an increase in pneumonia deaths, but there were also higher rates of some cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and rheumatic heart disease. Richard Hubbard of the British Lung Foundation said: "What this paper does show, is that there is clear geographical variation in deaths from pneumonia, lung cancer and COPD."

2. "Pollution 'alters brain function'" BBC News, March 11, 2008. A team at Zuyd University in the Netherlands studied the effects of diesel exhaust on humans. They found that after about 30 minutes exposure to diesel fumes the brain displayed (via EEG readings, electrical signals of the brain) a stress response that indicates a change in the way information is being processed in the brain cortex. This effect continued after the people were removed from exposure to the diesel fumes.

The lead researcher, Paul Borm, said "We can only speculate what these effects may mean for the chronic exposure to air pollution encountered in busy cities where the levels of such soot particles can be very high."

The article ends with this startling statement: "But a study of dogs in Mexico found those who lived in highly-polluted Mexico City had brain lesions similar to those seen in Alzheimer's patients, while those who lived in much less-polluted rural areas showed a much lower rate of damage to the brain."

3. "Smog Can Make People Sick, Even Indoors" Scientific American, January 29, 2008. Environmental health scientist Michael Apte of Lawrance Berkeley National Laboratory in California said: "We found that outdoor air pollution, ozone, is associated with symptoms of lower-respiratory and upper-respiratory stress that occur in buildings to workers." Ozone is an air-polluting oxygen molecule O3 which is formed when sunlight interacts with car exhaust.

The article explains: "Sick building syndrome is a term used to describe a broad range of ailments, including dry eye, congestion, difficulty breathing, fatigue and headaches that strike workers inside office buildings but disappear when they leave the premises."

The results from a study of indoor air quality data from 1994-1998 and a survey of office workers in 100 buildings in 37 cities (ranging from the most smog to the cleanest) showed that of the workers surveyed on average, even in buildings with no special history of sickness:

• nearly 19% complained of dry eye
• 21% felt congested on the job
• 4% complained of difficulty breathing
• more than 19% felt fatigued
• more than 15% reported having headaches while at work.

These figures are astounding and illustrate the damage occurring to many people in our society. In this article Michael Apte speculates that the symptoms experienced by people are due to unstable ozone molecules chemically interacting with the wide range of materials found in buildings. Ozone reacts with all types of materials from polyester, plastics, carpet fibres, the skin's natural oil, and many more, to produce toxic chemicals like formaldehyde and other irritants that are far worse than the ozone itself.

The article continues: "In other words, ozone seeping into buildings combines with other chemicals to produce more noxious air."

In addition to the outside air becoming more polluted with traffic, smoke, pesticides and many other substances, the general population is using more and more household chemicals in increasingly higher concentrations.

As it's getting warmer with summer approaching it's becoming tremendously difficult to effectively keep higher concentrations of household chemicals out of our apartment. If our neighbors have their laundry drying on their balconies (and this is a daily common occurrence) then I cannot open our balcony windows without experiencing great difficulty and discomfort breathing due to the laundry detergent and fabric softener chemicals exuding from the clothes.

If our neighbors have their windows open, the strong chemical fumes of laundry detergent with fabric softeners, household cleaning agents and personal grooming products such as perfume are so strong that it's necessary to close the windows to prevent the strong mixture from swamping our apartment.

The following article about the "Health Risks of Fabric Softeners" on the Allergy and Environmental Health Association web site has some disturbing information. They state that fabric softener is the most toxic product sold for daily household use and give the following information about it:

"...a user becomes 'chronically maladapted' to it. The exposure is so constant that it can be difficult to connect the product with the signs of reactivity it causes. Neurostimulant / irritants and central nervous system toxins used in these products are known to produce an addictive-type response that may cause the user to experience a feeling of pleasure when the product is directly inhaled. Regular users of fabric softeners (and perfumes) also often claim they 'can hardly smell it'. This too is an effect of chemical ingredients on neural receptors."

"The product is designed to impregnate fibers and slowly re-release for an extended period of time. That re-releasing affects the health not only of users, but those around them."

On the subject of "Risks of Perfumes and Scented Products" it continues: "The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collected samples of every perfume sold in North America in 1993. Every sample contained toluene...".  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health lists toluene in their Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, and the link can be followed to see this in more detail.

There is a list of some of the chemical ingredients found in fabric softeners and of the disorders each of these substances is known to cause. The list is worth reading.

When we first moved into this apartment building just over a year ago the stairwell was cleaned once a week with a relatively mild-scented cleaning detergent. The cleaning detergent has been changed to a more highly scented product which smells very much like the antibacterial strongly scented products that are routinely used in toilets. The stairwell is now cleaned 3 or 4 times a week with an increasingly more concentrated solution of this product.

It's becoming impossible to prevent large amounts of household cleaning chemicals from entering our apartment airflow. Even with large air filters working 24 hours a day the adverse effects are becoming worse and I'm becoming increasingly unable to function in this environment. When driving or walking in the vicinity of our apartments it's possible to smell that the area is encompassed by a cloud of chemicals.

As soon as I leave the area and enter the clean air of the foothills 20 minutes' walk behind where we live my breathing returns to normal and after a while I no longer feel lung pain. When I return to places where there are houses or apartment buildings, the fumes emanating from them cause a return of the burning pain in the lungs. Our apartment building is no exception to the norm, even passing cars leave a trail of scent from perfumes and scented products of their owners behind them.

As the intensity of the chemicals increases with the oncoming summer heat, I'm becoming more and more unwell at home. I'll have to spend much of my day outside in the cleaner air in the hills away from my home in order to reduce my exposures to these chemicals, to avoid becoming ill all the time and to try to prevent becoming even more sensitive to them.

If I'm not at home I can't paint egg tempera paintings as a full-time occupation. I had been hoping to create enough paintings to set up for an exhibition, and in time, earn enough money to be able to afford to live in a small house where I wouldn't be at the mercy of others' choices in cleaning habits.

It's frustrating beyond expression to be perfectly well in clean fresh air, but to essentially find myself poisoned in my home environment. I was hoping to get ahead with the artwork before our environment became prohibitive to my ability to function. I haven't given up, but it's becoming more and more difficult.

I wish, by sharing this information, that maybe more people can perhaps benefit from my experience and avoid having to reach this point. Even eliminating a few of these products from our daily lives can make a huge difference in how energetic and good we feel.

The cumulative impact of our choices can have a very high price in the future quality of our lives and those of our children. I wonder what it will take for us as a society to really understand the extent of the damage we're inflicting on ourselves and the wildlife around us. If you'd like to see more on chemical sensitivity, pollution, cleaning agents and the effects they're having, click here to see previous DweezelJazz posts on these topics.

How To Reduce Our Pollution Intake On Car Journeys

Ozone is a major component of urban air pollution and is associated with increased cardiovascular and pulmonary hospitalizations and deaths. An article published in the October Journal of Immunology and described by EurekAlert! says: "Ozone shuts down early immune response in lungs and body". The mechanisms for this remain unclear, and pulmonary researchers at Duke University Medical Center have been performing studies to find out more.

John Hollingsworth, M.D., and lead author of this study, said: "...it appears that ozone causes the innate immune system to overreact, killing key immune system cells, and possibly making the lung more susceptible to subsequent invaders, such as bacteria."

The article concludes: "The Environmental Protection Agency is in the final phases of reviewing and possibly updating the standards for allowable levels of ozone in the air. The current standard says that any amount greater than 85 parts per billion can be unhealthy for those at risk. Many medical groups, including the American Thoracic Society, recommend setting a stricter standard of 60 parts per billion, citing studies showing ozone's adverse effects on health, especially in children and those with compromised health."

One way we can take some control of the amount of exposure we undergo is to minimize it by using an air filter in our car. When we're out driving we can be exposed to a vast amount of pollution. Exhaust from cars and trucks, heavy duty vehicles on construction sites, ... the list is varied and long. One very effective and easy-to-install filter is the XR-100 Car air purifier. This air filter removes particles, odors, particulates and volatile organic compounds, and it cleans the air within the car 10 times per hour. This costs approximately 150 pounds UK Sterling.
It has straps to hang it from the back of a front seat and it plugs into the cigarette lighter outlet.





My experience is that it makes a tremendous difference and it's a simple and effective way to significantly reduce exposure to pollution on car journeys.
.

Jasmine And Her Tousle With Poor Air Quality

Jasmine loves to take showers these days. She goes into the bathroom and takes a proper shower, and if she doesn't get a chance to do that, she splashes in her water bowl. Here she is with her tummy still wet from having taken a shower earlier in the morning.



She likes to hang out on her play station and play with her toys.







Well, she does for a short while and then she starts flying...



























...from chair to chair (and even to lamps, even though lamps aren't 'allowed').




But she never stays in one place for long...













Back to the play station...













On to the top of the air filter (this too is forbidden territory because she could reach the electrical cable and chomp on it - not a good idea!)

The air filter has always been placed three or four feet from Jazzy's cage and we thought this should work for the entire room.

But we live in an apartment block near a major road and the air quality is often poor. Neighbors use strong cleaning agents, laundry detergents and fabric softeners so that regularly throughout the day some chemical agent enters the apartment. Pesticides are used on the nearby fields to safeguard the crops. There are also at least three building sites for new apartment building complexes within one to two blocks of our place. Several times a day there is a constant stream of cars and buses going to and from the school at the end of our road. To sum it all up: that's a fair amount of pollution.

African Greys are known to have allergies and be sensitive to air quality. Jazzy already had allergies before she came to live with us. She scratches at the back of her neck, and I've noticed that this regularly coincides with when I'm experiencing difficulties with the air myself.

Recently Jazzy had become constantly very very loud and even aggressive. She has also been scratching tonnes more and, as a result, has lost even more of the little feathers on her neck, leaving soft down exposed. No matter how many toys I gave her or how much I tried to entertain her it didn't solve her dissatisfaction.

The air quality around here has become noticeably worse in the last month or so and in desperation, after weeks of enduring Jazzy's very loud and poor behavior, I put the air filter a foot away from her cage and pointed the vents under it. It's absolutely incredible how changed she is since then: she's extremely gentle, she chats but doesn't heckle, she's playing with her toys like never before. Her aggression is totally gone. She's bright and sparky again - a happy bird!

With such a dramatic change in her behavior from being so consistently difficult to transforming into just about angelic with the filter close to her, I wonder how many other pet birds there are who are having difficulties with the air quality around them? For more information about the air filter see previous post: "Air Filters For Asthma, Allergies and Chemical Sensitivity". I'm so pleased to see her happy again. She plays with her beads...




...chomps on her straw toys...










...stops to take a breather...















...and of course, does silly things for fun and to make us all laugh.

The Importance of Knowing About Our Chemical Environment, Part II

Being well-informed is all well and good, but situations also occur that as individuals we may not, in the short-term, necessarily be able to do anything about. We're surrounded by materials that are proving on a larger scale and varying conditions to be more problematic to the health than previously understood.

These two articles provide a good introduction into problems that can arise:

1. Prolonged respiratory problems for oil spill clean-up volunteers
2. The 9/11 Cover-Up

The first article was published in September in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, by the American Thoracic Society and is described at EurekAlert!. The article says that researchers from Spain say that workers and volunteers who helped in the clean-up effort after the 2002 Prestige Oil spill off the coast of Galicia, Spain, exhibit prolonged respiratory symptoms resulting from their exposure. More than 100,000 people participated in the clean-up effort.

Dr. Francisco Pozo-Rodriguez, M.D., lead investigator of the study, wrote: "To our knowledge, no previous study has explored long-term respiratory effects in clean-up workers of other oil spills. Our findings suggest that participation in clean-up work of oil spills may result in prolonged adverse respiratory health effects 1-2 years after exposure. Increasing awareness of the potential chronic respiratory effects among clean up workers of future oil spills, in combination with appropriate hygiene regulations, is strongly recommended."

The second article, cited above, was published in the Special Anniversary Issue of Discover magazine in October. The online version of this article can be seen here.

This article reports that up to 70% of first responders are ill as a result of 9/11 contamination. "About 70,000 New Yorkers so far have listed themselves with the World Trade Center Health Registry, a database that tracks the health impact of the 9/11 attacks. The registry has been criticized for excluding large numbers of those potentially sickened outside a designated one-square mile area. Despite the insistent denials of city and federal officials, tens of thousands of New Yorkers were unnecessarily exposed to a chemical brew without even the most rudimentary precautions."

The article continues: "Since the attacks, various scientific studies have demonstrated that New Yorkers are engulfed in billows of illness and disease related to 9/11. First the cough and mental health problems caught the attention of local doctors. Then chronic respiratory and gastrointestinal conditions began to surface. Recently a program at Mount Sinai noted the emergence of rare blood cancers among 9/11 first responders. Experts predict that more problems will surface in the next few decades."

Later it describes: "Heat up a ballpoint pen, a computer, an office sofa, electric wire, or any other object you might find in a high-rise and there comes a point when you can inhale it. The Twin Towers contained tens of thousands of computer terminals, each housing about four pounds of lead, and an untold number of fluorescent bulbs that contained mercury. Released metal particles from the smoldering pit of the World Trade Center were so fine that they could easily slip past a paper face mask and reach deep into lung tissue, where they are poorly soluble in lung fluid. Metals and glass can remain trapped there for long periods of time and make their way into the heart."

Thomas Cahill, a professor of physics and atmospheric sciences at the University of California at Davis has led some of the most exhaustive scientific studies of 9/11-related toxins. From his studies he concluded: "The fuming World Trade Center debris pile was a chemical factory that exhaled toxins in a particularly dangerous form that could penetrate deep into the lungs of rescue workers and local residents".

The Discover 9/11 article is long and sobering, but it's well worth the time it takes to read it in full. I became aware of this article by reading a post in a really great blog called BLDG BLOG by Geoff Manaugh. His post, "Inhaling 9/11", is thought-provoking with its presentation of a new viewpoint, along with a few incredible photographs. This too is very well worth reading.

Large scale disasters present us with difficulties that sometimes are not completely surmountable without injury. But foreknowledge can empower us to make better decisions. And if, on a smaller scale, we are confronted with a home or office fire, or some other incident, we may be able to avoid exposure through making choices we might not otherwise make. Knowledge provides us with a fighting chance: the power of choice.

Scientifically Quantifying Damage Caused By Chemical Exposures

Last month the Canadian newspaper, The Star, ran an article entitled: "New house will kill me, woman says". The woman lives on the top floor of an old apartment building which is soon to be demolished and replaced. The article is rather sensationalized making the subject matter appear dubious in credibility. But it's worth having a look at what it's about.

The woman says she becomes unwell when around certain shampoos, aftershave, perfumed deodorant, and especially fabric softeners. She has a tarp on the roof to keep out the rain because the chemicals required to repair the roof would cause her difficulties. In 1991 certain grooming products bothered her, and then in 1994 she became severely ill and after that had to live a more restricted existence to avoid exposures.

The woman says that if she isn't exposed to these chemicals she's fine and that her main challenge now is to find a home free of volatile organic compounds. As the report says: "That means a self-contained living space not contaminated by other people's perfumes and laundry and cleaning products. That also means ceramic or wood floors, not laminated ones, and other natural materials, not wallboard."

Although this information is not framed in a scientifically convincing or factual manner, the progression of many people's development of chemical sensitivity follows a similar pattern: at first they may experience slight physical disturbances when in the presence of perfumes, cosmetic products, new carpets,...; the list of possible items is long. And then later they may experience a sudden increase in the severity of their reaction to chemicals, perhaps after some large chemical exposure or increased frequencies of small exposures. At first it hardly affects a person's daily life.

This is happening to a increasing percentage of the population. They quietly fall off the radar screen of normal social life: over time, as they become more sensitive they're less able to participate in community or social situations because they need to avoid the exposures they receive in public places. Chemically sensitive people may become unable to work because of exposures, both from the workplace and the cosmetic products co-workers use. Even when unemployed they often appear to be healthy and well - a routine doctor check-up often shows normal. Their situation is, at present, almost transparent to accountability in our society.

In the meantime, mainstream science is discovering that there is much more scientists don't know in terms of toxicity than was previously conceived. Assumptions that were taken for granted as correct are now being scrutinized as likely having been mistaken.

An article posted by The Independent on September 24, "Chemicals in non-stick pans may retard babies' growth" with caption "Toxin in daily use in the home should be phased out, says researcher". This article reports that the chemical, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), has been used so widely and is so persistent in the environment that it has been found in rain, water supplies, food, wildlife and human blood all over the world. This chemical is used to make non-stick pans and stain resistant coatings for fabrics.

Two independent studies were done recently, one in the U.S. and one in Denmark, and the results published in the journal of Environmental Health Perspectives. The article says that these studies suggest that PFOA is damaging at far lower levels in the blood than had been previously realized. The researchers found that babies with higher levels of this chemical in their umbilical cords were born smaller and also with smaller heads. It is a medically established fact that even small reductions in weight and brain development at birth is associated with health problems throughout life. The article continues with: "Laboratory research has previously shown that the chemical causes rats to be born smaller, but only at levels many thousands of times higher."

This begs the question as to whether studies in rats for chemical toxicity is a good basis for deciding whether substances are unlikely to be toxic for humans. The use of teflon pans, irons, etc. around the home is known to cause death in house pet birds.

Science Daily posted an article, based on a study published in August by the American Thoracic Society in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, entitled: "Air Pollution Linked to Cardiovascular Risk Indices In Healthy Young Adults". Researchers in Taiwan have demonstrated that urban air pollution simultaneously increases key indicators of cardiovascular risk in young adults. The lead author, Chang-Chuan Chan, Sc.D, of National Taiwan University's College of Public Health, wrote: "This study provides evidence that urban air pollution is associated with systemic inflammation / oxidative stress, impairment of the fibrinogenic system, activation of blood coagulation and alterations in the autonomic nervous system in young, healthy humans."

As our world becomes more and more congested with the use of newly developed products and the chemical combinations occurring in our environment increase, we need to take more notice of our personal choices. Like the canaries used in mines in the old days, maybe people who have chemical sensitivities are showing an early warning signal; they might be more genetically predisposed to harm from these chemicals, and it might do well to consider reducing the number of chemicals we as human beings expose ourselves to on a regular basis.

An interesting development has occurred in that there may now be a way to scientifically quantify damage caused to an individual by exposure to chemicals. On September 17 the BBC News published an article: "DNA test hope over damages claims" with caption, "Scientists say a new DNA test may help to prove if people have had their health damaged by exposure to chemicals." The article says that samples of DNA are taken from a healthy person and these are exposed to a chemical to see which genes are affected. This is then compared with the DNA of someone who claims to have been affected by that chemical or combination of chemicals. This technique was developed by Dr. Bruce Gillis at the University of Illinois.

The article cites an example in which this method was used for a man who developed gall bladder cancer. He had been exposed to a mixture of 8 chemicals. None of the chemicals on its own was a carcinogen, but this technique showed that, in combination, they increased the activity of cancer-causing genes.

There are more and more reports of complications with exposures to chemicals and as science becomes more refined in its ability to detect these problems we'll learn more. In the meantime, whatever you can do to minimize your exposure would be to your benefit and also to those around you, especially young ones. For more information on chemical exposure, chemical sensitivity and what can be done to minimize these you can also see previous posts on the DweezelJazz blog.

It's not necessarily convenient to change our lifestyle and the products we use, but it might have more paybacks to our future and those of society than imagined at the present time. Even small changes can make a big difference.

How Safe Are The Products We Use?

A BBC News article, "Office printers 'are health risk'", published July 31st, reported that an investigation of a range of printer models. The study showed that almost a third of them emitted potentially dangerous levels of toner into the air which can cause a range of health problems, including respiratory irritation and other chronic illnesses. The article states that a team of Australian scientists has found that the "humble office laser printer can damage lungs in much the same way as smoke particles from cigarettes".

As illustrated in a previous post, "Becoming More Aware of Toxins In Our Environment", it would benefit us all to be more aware of what products we use in our daily routine. While it's not possible to know which products are not beneficial to the health, we can minimize the use of those that are known or suspected to be harmful, and we can take measures to ensure that our local environment is well ventilated.

On August 16, Science Daily reported on an article published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine that states researchers in Taiwan have demonstrated for the first time that urban pollution simultaneously affects key indicators of cardiovascular risk in young adults. The lead author of the study, Chang-Chuan Chan, Sc.D., of National Taiwan University's College of Public Health wrote: "This study provides evidence that urban air pollution is associated with systemic inflammation/oxidative stress, impairment of the fibrinogenic system, activation of blood coagulation and alterations in the autonomic nervous system in young, healthy humans."

Another article published in the same journal and also reported on August 16 by Science Daily: "High Pollution Linked To Poor Lung Function Growth In Children In Mexico City" states that "Children who are chronically exposed to higher levels of air pollution show marked deficiencies in lung growth and function, and not just short-term breathing problems." The lead author, Isabelle Romieu, M.D., M.P.H. of the Instituto Nacional de Salud Publico in Mexico wrote: "In addition to the important impact of lung health, early lung deficits may increase the risk of developing chronic obstructive lung disease later in life, as well as cardiovascular morbidity and general mortality."

A BBC News article published July 13, "'New tests needed' for chemicals", states that scientists writing in the journal Science say that about one-third of organic substances (which could amount to approximately 10,000 substances) in commercial use need re-testing for possible toxicity to human and environmental health.

Conventional tests for toxic substances involve measuring how effectively a substance dissolves in fat versus water; the measure is called Kow. This works well to estimate the accumulative potential in food chains involving fish, shellfish and plankton. The scientists performing this study concluded that a different measure is needed to estimate the accumulation of toxic substances in air-breathing animals, that would measure how well a substance can be absorbed across the lung membrane during respiration. This measure is called Koa.

The article states: "Classes of compounds possessing low Kow but high Koa include endosulfans and HCHs, which are used as inseciticides, musk xylene, an ingredient of perfumes and soaps, and the tetrachlorobenzenes." These substances would pass the conventional tests for toxicity. It's interesting that these substances very commonly present respiratory and other problems for people with chemical sensitivities. See previous post "What Is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity?"

As discussed in post, "Chemical Sensitivity and the New EU Chemical Law", there are, in addition to the omissions in the conventional measuring system, great gaping omissions in what substances are being studied at all. As individuals we can try to protect ourselves as much as possible from the hazard of the many chemicals that have found their way via products into our daily lives. There are a number of other articles here in the DweezelJazz blog, under Chemical Sensitivity, Asthma and Allergy, that you may find helpful.

Following Nature's Example To Reduce Pollution And Energy Waste

If human beings learn to behave more like swarms of insects, schools of fish, flocks of birds, or herds of animals we could make better progress with reducing pollution and taking care of our planet.

There are an increasing number of reports in the news related to climate change and pollution. It's becoming more and more clear that we need to take large scale action in order to optimize what the future holds for us and our world. There have been a few articles recently which illustrate clearly that we're jeopardizing the welfare of many people throughout the world already.

Back in May, a BBC article, "Oxygen supplies for India police" announced that police stations across Calcutta in India were equipped with oxygen devices to enable police to offset the effects of pollution. The article says that a recent report showed that 70% of the people in the city suffer from respiratory disorders, such as lung cancer, breathing difficulties and asthma, and that the police were among the worst hit by poor air quality. Doctors have cautioned that the oxygen may not help the policemen because "many of the pollutants are too deeply lodged in their lungs".

Another BBC article, published earlier this month, says that a report was quoted in a Financial Times article to say that "High levels of air pollution in China's cities leads to 350,000-400,000 premature deaths...Another 300,000 die because of poor-quality air indoors." There seems to be some dispute over the figures, but it is apparent from reports that increasing numbers of people are dying due to pollution.

Health problems all over the world are increasing as a result of pollution. Climate change is also becoming more noticeable as a result of our actions. A Greenpeace article "Expedition documents melting Himalayan glaciers" says that climate change is threatening the glacier source that provides water for one-sixth of humanity. The article says that scientists predict that 80% of the Himalayan glaciers will disappear within 30 years at the current warming rates.

Pollution and climate issues are clearly becoming more pronounced with every passing year. The key to reversing, or at the very least, slowing the progression of these problems is to raise general awareness to the severity of the problems. It seems there's still quite a ways to go to convince the majority of the population, as can be seen in the BBC article: "'Scepticism' over climate claims".

Seth Godin makes a great point in his blog post "Times a million". He says: "The way to sell the distant is to make it immediate." Be persuasive by presenting an argument that's personally meaningful by making sure it's something relevant to the person's experience. If the majority of individuals become convinced that these issues are important this could lead to a huge change.

The Live Earth concerts held this last weekend were a great way to combine pleasure and fun along with drawing people to a venue that raises awareness of what individuals can do in their own daily lives.

A couple of days ago I came across an article, "Swarms", at the Patagonia blog, which drew my attention to an article in National Geographic entitled "Swarm Theory". This article discusses the behavior of large groups in nature, such as bees, ants, schools of herring, herds of caribou. It looks to answer how the collective group can act as one unit in the best interests of all of them as a whole. Vijay Kumar, a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Pennsylvania is quoted as saying: "In biology, if you look at groups with large numbers, there are very few examples where you have a central agent."

For animals traveling in large numbers, coordinating their movements with one another is vital to their staying alive. No one animal is in charge. The overall behavior relies on communication between individuals, while each individual follows a set of simple rules, each one acting on local information. The individual doesn't know what's happening throughout the entire community. The sum of these relatively simple actions by each individual adds up to a complex behavior of collective intelligence.

Software programs have been modeled on this simple behavior and are being used to successfully create management strategies for complex business processes, such as routing trucks and scheduling airlines. Using this type of behavior model is making the businesses much more efficient than they were when a centralized intelligence dictated what was to be done.

This emphasizes that one of the most effective ways for human beings to make a difference in any endeavor is for each individual to act according to a basic set of guidelines, according to what is possible or needed in their local vicinity. Swarm theory shows us how vitally important and effective it really is for each of us to make each small effort towards reducing pollution and energy waste, even if we don't understand or know what everyone else is doing.

Becoming More Aware of Toxins In Our Environment

There are many sources of toxins that are not within our immediate ability to control. The Independent published an article today entitled "Toxic fumes on planes 'threaten thousands of passengers each year'". The article reports that scientific research has shown that fumes present in planes have rendered pilots incapable of flying their aircraft safely.

A technology is used in which hot air is taken from the engine, cooled down and then fed, without being filtered, into the plane's cabin and cockpit. Sometimes it becomes contaminated with engine oils containing many different chemicals. These enter the air in the entire plane and are breathed by passengers and crew alike.

At University College London in a study of 27 affected pilots, 26 of them were found to suffer chronic health problems, including fatigue, sleep difficulties, fluctuating gastrointestinal problems, numbness and tingling in fingers and toes, memory loss and word-finding difficulties. Some of them reported cognitive failures, such as the inability to retain numerical data, confusing information provided by air traffic control, and being unable to remember events such as whether the undercarriage had been raised or lowered.

These symptoms are typical of those experienced by many people with chemical sensitivity. In this case, it has taken the discovery of pilot illness, and their consequent inability to fly an airplane safely, to induce studies which, it would seem, should be a routine requirement before flight.

As increasing numbers of people report health difficulties with the large numbers of chemicals we encounter daily, hopefully much more will be done proactively, by industry and regulatory organizations, to monitor environments and products more rigorously.

There are many circumstances that result in exposures to chemicals we are unaware of. Many of these, as yet, have not been officially deemed unsatisfactory for our health and well-being. Our society leads us to take for granted that our welfare is factored into the sale and creation of technologies and products that we use. Air quality during routine and repeated flights is not something we would generally question or doubt.

Many people with MCS are unable to travel by plane. For someone suffering from the symptoms of multiple chemical sensitivity, it isn't possible to ignore the effects on their bodies that they experience in different environments. It's a natural result to question much more frequently whether the official standards are being set appropriately.

For someone who doesn't experience chemical sensitivities, reading such an article might seem less compelling from a personal viewpoint with regard to exposure to toxins. However, there are other factors it does well to consider. What happens to the pilots when they are no longer able to fly, even as passengers, without becoming ill? What if this happens to frequent flyers? What happens to people who live close to busy airports where such emissions into the environment are routine? What if the cumulative exposure to other chemicals of a similar nature makes a person more susceptible to problems in the future? What if that person is you or someone you love?The pilot mentioned in this article, who now becomes ill even when traveling as a passenger, can no longer go to work as a pilot in these circumstances. Like the airplane where passengers and employees are forced to breathe the air that is piped in, there are many environments we come across where the air quality cannot be controlled by the individual. Many people who are affected by chemicals drop off the radar screen of society because they become ill in many public places, including their workplaces.

Just as being aware of the effect of human activity on the environment is vitally important to the future welfare of our planet, so is the need for our society to become aware of what is happening to a sector of its population. As long as we remain ignorant of it, it's not possible to take action to better protect ourselves, and our loved ones, by making informed choices.

What Can We Do As Individuals For The Environment?

In his article My web vs. The web Seth Godin points out that the world wide web has billions of pages and that the percentage each one of us will actually see of these in our lifetimes is so small as to be nearly unmeasurable. It's like thinking of grains of sand on a beach: there are so many out there that it's hard to really understand what that many means.
These pages represent an incredible amount of human activity, and yet they only represent a small fraction of what is actually taking place on Earth.

Even in the relatively small number of pages that we do encounter on the web, they bring us closer to people all over the world than has ever happened in history before. We can be aware of events affecting the lives of others, far away from us, almost in real time as they are happening. We can read about, hear and see those events, either as news reports, or as first-hand personal accounts and views.

There are so many of us now, that in relatively short time periods, actions taken in one hemisphere can directly affect the lives of those in the other. For example, pollution created in one country can have serious repercussions in others.

In addition, communication and mobilization of goods and people have created a global environment that can affect our lives just as much as our local environment. For example, the job market and the placement of industry are no longer defined simply by local demand, but also by global economics.

In a BBC article about the current plight of Europe's seas it says that they are in a serious state of decline due to coastal development, overfishing and pollution. The article goes on to point out that the study also showed that in some places, such as the North Sea, the ecosystem was improving. The reason given for this is that some of the heavy industries have been moved to China or India, probably having a severely negative effect there.

We are so many people going about our daily lives as best we can, sometimes unwittingly contributing to the unfolding of events. It is very easy to feel daunted by the enormity of the situation and the roller coaster ride we are taking ourselves on, along with all the species on our planet.


It's easy to forget the importance of the individual amongst all the numbers of people. Some individuals do a great deal to influence the world around them; others do things in small ways.




But society can only move forward when many individuals push toward improvement.

Each of us can make a vitally significant contribution by learning what we can do, and implementing it to minimise our personal negative impact on the Earth.

Common Senses

Spring is my favorite time of year. With color bursting out everywhere, it feels as though everything has a new bright sheen to it. Goals seem more attainable and a fresh outlook on life awakens. It just feels good to be alive.

But for some, it's a season of trial. Last week we were invited to dinner at a friend's house and one of the young boys of the family was suffering noticeably with swollen, teary eyes. His father explained that both his sons have severe allergies and that he was particularly concerned because his elder son regularly experiences difficulty breathing. He explained that they were both too young to take allergy medication and that he wanted to do something now to help them as much as possible.

With every passing year allergies, asthma and chemical sensitivities become more prevelant in society, and can range in effect from discomfort and inconvenience to serious threat to the health and well-being of a person. There are many hypotheses for the causes of this increase, and it is difficult to define absolute limits on exposures because individuals have varying thresholds and severity of reactions to trigger substances. This is exacerbated by the challenge of accurately quantifying and regulating the exposures an average individual receives in his or her normal daily environment. In addition, a given individual's response can also change over time to those trigger substances and their concentration levels. For people living in cities and valleys, pollution can build up rapidly. For those in the country there is often pollution extending from the cities, there are fields and hillsides full of grass and flowers, and also cultivated fields treated regularly with fertilizers and pesticides.

I have many years' experience dealing with and learning about such issues and have found that there are ways to reduce the symptoms without, or in addition to, taking medication for them. There are simple things that can be tried in order to determine if it helps the individual. The essence of this approach is to:

1. Eliminate many of the manufactured chemical agents and synthetic products which are regularly present in our surroundings.
2. Reduce exposure to known common allergens in our environment.
   
3. Try to live a balanced and healthy life with regular exercise.

The concept is simple, but our lives have become inundated with products that we take at face value as having been tested and shown not to adversely affect health. Unfortunately the parameters for defining meaningful tests of these products in relation to the human body is usually ill-defined. And often these tests do not take into consideration the context of mixing one product with others that we may regularly come into contact with. The cumulative effect of years of routinely using a variety of products containing many different chemical combinations has not been determined.

Consequently, knowing where to start in trying to improve our personal environment is not always obvious. A simple and often effective place to start is to stop using products containing strong fragrance; for example, perfumes and fabric softeners. Eliminating these from regular use can substantially alleviate allergy symptoms and asthma.